<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>DevOps on Mengboy 技术笔记</title>
    <link>https://www.mfun.ink/categories/devops/</link>
    <description>Recent content in DevOps on Mengboy 技术笔记</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.156.0</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.mfun.ink/categories/devops/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Responses &#43; GitHub Actions PR Risk Gate: Automated Evals, Tiered Blocking, and One-Click Rollback</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You don&amp;rsquo;t need an AI reviewer that “sounds smart.” You need a gate that &lt;strong&gt;stops risky PRs before they hit main&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This post shows a production-ready minimum setup: OpenAI Responses generates structured risk output, GitHub Actions enforces tiered policies, and critical failures can trigger a one-click rollback.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Responses &#43; GitHub Actions 的 PR 风险闸门：自动评测、分级阻断与一键回滚</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/16/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/16/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;你不需要一个“会聊天”的 AI 审查器，你需要一个&lt;strong&gt;能阻断坏改动进主干&lt;/strong&gt;的风险闸门。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;这篇给一套可上线的最小方案：OpenAI Responses 负责生成结构化审查结论，GitHub Actions 负责分级阻断，发现高风险时自动回滚到安全提交。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GitHub Actions &#43; AI Agent Auto-Fix Pipeline: Failure Tiers, Regression Gates, and Security Guardrails</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/github-actions-ai-agent-auto-fix-pipeline/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 01:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/github-actions-ai-agent-auto-fix-pipeline/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When CI keeps failing, the real risk is not “slow fixes” — it is “fast bad fixes.”
This guide gives you a practical &lt;strong&gt;GitHub Actions + AI Agent auto-fix pipeline&lt;/strong&gt; with failure tiering, strict edit boundaries, and merge-time gates.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GitHub Actions &#43; AI Agent 自动修复流水线：失败分级、回归测试与安全闸门</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/27/github-actions-ai-agent-auto-fix-pipeline/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 01:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/27/github-actions-ai-agent-auto-fix-pipeline/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;线上 CI 一旦连续红灯，团队最怕的不是“修得慢”，而是“修坏更多”。
这篇给你一套可落地的 &lt;strong&gt;GitHub Actions + AI Agent 自动修复流水线&lt;/strong&gt;：先做失败分级，再限制 AI 修改范围，最后用回归与安全闸门兜底。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Redis Distributed Lock Best Practices (with Common Misuse Cases)</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/redis-distributed-lock-best-practices/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:55:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/redis-distributed-lock-best-practices/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In high-concurrency scenarios, distributed locks are essential for ensuring data consistency. However, many developers&amp;rsquo; understanding of Redis distributed locks stops at &amp;ldquo;SETNX&amp;rdquo;, leading to frequent production incidents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article comprehensively covers the correct usage of Redis distributed locks from principles, implementation, common misuse cases to production-grade solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Redis 分布式锁正确姿势（含误用案例）</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/19/redis-distributed-lock-best-practices/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:55:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/19/redis-distributed-lock-best-practices/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;在高并发场景下，分布式锁是保证数据一致性的关键组件。但很多开发者对Redis分布式锁的理解停留在&amp;quot;SETNX&amp;quot;层面，导致线上事故频发。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;本文将从原理、实现、常见误用到生产级解决方案，全面梳理Redis分布式锁的正确使用姿势。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GitHub Actions 自动部署 Hugo：防翻车配置与排障清单</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/16/github-actions-hugo-auto-deploy-safe-config/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:59:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/16/github-actions-hugo-auto-deploy-safe-config/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;本地 &lt;code&gt;hugo&lt;/code&gt; 能跑，到了 GitHub Actions 就翻车，是很多博客维护者的日常。
最常见的问题不是“不会写 workflow”，而是环境不一致、版本漂移、权限设置遗漏。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hugo Auto Deploy with GitHub Actions: Safe Config and Troubleshooting</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/github-actions-hugo-auto-deploy-safe-config/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:59:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/github-actions-hugo-auto-deploy-safe-config/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Your local &lt;code&gt;hugo&lt;/code&gt; build works, but GitHub Actions fails randomly. Classic.
The root cause is usually not the workflow syntax. It is environment drift, missing permissions, and unstable dependencies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WSL2 &#43; Docker Network Troubleshooting: Fix DNS Timeouts and Image Pull Failures</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/wsl2-docker-network-troubleshooting/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:50:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/wsl2-docker-network-troubleshooting/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If your &lt;strong&gt;WSL2 + Docker&lt;/strong&gt; setup suddenly fails with &lt;code&gt;docker pull&lt;/code&gt; timeouts, &lt;code&gt;Temporary failure in name resolution&lt;/code&gt;, or containers that start but cannot access the internet, don&amp;rsquo;t nuke your environment yet. Most cases are recoverable in 15 minutes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide gives you a practical sequence: identify whether the fault is DNS, proxy/VPN, virtual NIC, or Docker daemon config—then apply the smallest fix first.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WSL2 &#43; Docker 网络异常排查：DNS 超时、拉镜像失败到恢复可用</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/11/wsl2-docker-network-troubleshooting/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:50:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/11/wsl2-docker-network-troubleshooting/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;如果你在 &lt;strong&gt;WSL2 + Docker&lt;/strong&gt; 环境里遇到 &lt;code&gt;docker pull&lt;/code&gt; 超时、&lt;code&gt;Temporary failure in name resolution&lt;/code&gt;、容器能启动但不能联网，先别重装系统。绝大多数问题都能在 15 分钟内定位并修好。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;这篇给你一套可复制的排查顺序：先确认是 DNS、代理、虚拟网卡还是 Docker daemon 配置，再按最小改动恢复网络。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
