<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>FlameGraph on Mengboy 技术笔记</title>
    <link>https://www.mfun.ink/tags/flamegraph/</link>
    <description>Recent content in FlameGraph on Mengboy 技术笔记</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.156.0</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:20:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.mfun.ink/tags/flamegraph/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Go Memory Leak Triage in Production: pprof &#43; FlameGraph Step by Step</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/go-memory-leak-pprof-flamegraph/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:20:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/go-memory-leak-pprof-flamegraph/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If your Go service RSS keeps climbing, drops after restart, then climbs again, you likely have a memory retention problem (or an actual leak pattern).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do not start with random code edits. Run a clean evidence chain: &lt;strong&gt;metrics trend check → pprof snapshots → FlameGraph comparison → object growth path → regression validation&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Go 服务内存泄漏定位实战：pprof &#43; FlameGraph 一次找准</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/14/go-memory-leak-pprof-flamegraph/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:20:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/14/go-memory-leak-pprof-flamegraph/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;线上 Go 服务 RSS 一路涨，重启后短暂恢复，过几小时继续涨——这就是典型“疑似内存泄漏”场景。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;别先拍脑袋改代码，先把证据链跑通：&lt;strong&gt;监控确认 → pprof 采样 → FlameGraph 对比 → 定位对象增长路径 → 回归验证&lt;/strong&gt;。这套流程跑完，基本能把“玄学泄漏”打成“可复现 bug”。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
