<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>RAG on Mengboy 技术笔记</title>
    <link>https://www.mfun.ink/tags/rag/</link>
    <description>Recent content in RAG on Mengboy 技术笔记</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.156.0</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.mfun.ink/tags/rag/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Go &#43; OpenAI Responses Agent Memory Layering: Short-Term Context, Long-Term Index, and Cost Caps</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/go-openai-responses-agent-memory-layering/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/go-openai-responses-agent-memory-layering/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In production Go agents, the first thing that breaks is usually not model quality. It is memory management: context grows, bills spike, and answers drift.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use a 3-layer memory design:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;L1: short-term conversational window (seconds)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;L2: rolling summary (minutes)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;L3: long-term retrieval memory (days)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Go &#43; OpenAI Responses Agent 记忆分层实战：短期上下文、长期索引与成本封顶</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/18/go-openai-responses-agent-memory-layering/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/18/go-openai-responses-agent-memory-layering/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;你在 Go 里做 Agent，最容易翻车的不是推理能力，而是“记忆”失控：上下文越来越长、账单越来越高、回答却越来越飘。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;这篇给你一个可落地的三层方案：&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;L1：短期会话上下文（秒级，强相关）&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;L2：中期摘要记忆（分钟级，压缩）&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;L3：长期检索记忆（天级，向量索引）&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RAG Accuracy Playbook: Retrieval Recall, Re-Ranking, and Evaluation Loop</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/rag-retrieval-rerank-eval-loop/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:56:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/rag-retrieval-rerank-eval-loop/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If your RAG system feels unreliable, switching to a more expensive LLM is usually the wrong first move. In most cases, the bottleneck is retrieval quality: weak recall, poor ranking, and no measurement loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide gives a practical path: make recall broader, make ranking sharper, then close the loop with offline + online evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RAG 不准怎么办：检索召回、重排与评估闭环落地指南</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/17/rag-retrieval-rerank-eval-loop/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:56:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/02/17/rag-retrieval-rerank-eval-loop/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;很多团队做 RAG 的第一反应是“把 embedding 换成更贵的模型”，结果成本上去了，效果却不稳定。真正的问题通常不在生成，而在检索链路：召回不全、排序不准、评估缺失。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;这篇给一套可直接落地的做法：先把召回做厚，再把重排做准，最后用离线 + 在线指标形成持续优化闭环。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
