<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Reranker on Mengboy 技术笔记</title>
    <link>https://www.mfun.ink/tags/reranker/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Reranker on Mengboy 技术笔记</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.156.0</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:56:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.mfun.ink/tags/reranker/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>RAG Accuracy Playbook: Retrieval Recall, Re-Ranking, and Evaluation Loop</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/rag-retrieval-rerank-eval-loop/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:56:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/rag-retrieval-rerank-eval-loop/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If your RAG system feels unreliable, switching to a more expensive LLM is usually the wrong first move. In most cases, the bottleneck is retrieval quality: weak recall, poor ranking, and no measurement loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide gives a practical path: make recall broader, make ranking sharper, then close the loop with offline + online evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
