<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Rollback on Mengboy 技术笔记</title>
    <link>https://www.mfun.ink/tags/rollback/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Rollback on Mengboy 技术笔记</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.156.0</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.mfun.ink/tags/rollback/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Responses &#43; GitHub Actions PR Risk Gate: Automated Evals, Tiered Blocking, and One-Click Rollback</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You don&amp;rsquo;t need an AI reviewer that “sounds smart.” You need a gate that &lt;strong&gt;stops risky PRs before they hit main&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This post shows a production-ready minimum setup: OpenAI Responses generates structured risk output, GitHub Actions enforces tiered policies, and critical failures can trigger a one-click rollback.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Responses &#43; GitHub Actions 的 PR 风险闸门：自动评测、分级阻断与一键回滚</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/16/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/16/openai-responses-github-actions-pr-risk-gate/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;你不需要一个“会聊天”的 AI 审查器，你需要一个&lt;strong&gt;能阻断坏改动进主干&lt;/strong&gt;的风险闸门。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;这篇给一套可上线的最小方案：OpenAI Responses 负责生成结构化审查结论，GitHub Actions 负责分级阻断，发现高风险时自动回滚到安全提交。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Responses Structured Outputs &#43; Go：Schema 演进、坏样本兜底与灰度回滚</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/11/openai-responses-structured-outputs-go-schema-evolution-fallback-rollback/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/2026/03/11/openai-responses-structured-outputs-go-schema-evolution-fallback-rollback/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Structured Outputs 最容易翻车的地方，不是“模型不听话”，而是&lt;strong&gt;你把 schema 当成了永远不变的圣旨&lt;/strong&gt;。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;线上一旦进入版本演进期，最常见的事故就是：字段新增后老消费端崩、枚举值扩展后校验误杀、坏样本把整条链路拖死，最后只能半夜回滚，像在给自己写惊悚片。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenAI Responses Structured Outputs with Go: Schema Evolution, Bad-Case Fallbacks, and Gradual Rollback</title>
      <link>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/openai-responses-structured-outputs-go-schema-evolution-fallback-rollback/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.mfun.ink/english/post/openai-responses-structured-outputs-go-schema-evolution-fallback-rollback/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The hardest part of Structured Outputs is not getting JSON once. It is surviving schema changes without turning production into a small fire with excellent logs and terrible business results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once a Go service starts evolving prompts and response contracts, the usual failure modes show up fast: a new required field breaks older consumers, an enum expands and strict validation kills valid requests, or one bad sample drags the whole chain into retries and rollback panic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
